Advancing Transparency and Impact of Research: Initiating Crosstalk Between Indigenous Research and Mainstream “Open Science”
Publication Year: 2021
Author(s): PLui PP , Skewes MC , Gobrial S, Rollock D
Abstract:
To answer questions about human psychology, psychological science needs to yield credible findings. Because of their goals of understanding people’s lived experiences and advocating for the needs of the Native communities, Indigenous scholars tend to use community-based participatory research (CBPR) or approach science from a constructivist framework. The primary goal of mainstream psychological science is to uncover generalizable facts about human functioning. Approached from a postpositivist framework, mainstream psychological scholars tend to assume the possibility of identifying researcher biases and achieving objective science. Recently, many psychological findings failed to replicate in new samples. The replication crisis has raised concerns about the validity of psychological science. Mainstream open science practices have been promoted as a solution to the replication crisis; the movement encourages researchers to emphasize transparency and accountability to the broad scientific community.
Source of Publication: Journal of Indigenous Research
Vol/Issue: 9
DOI No.: 10.31219/osf.io/bg9a4
Publisher/Organisation: Digital Commons
URL:
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=kicjir
Theme: Indigenous People | Subtheme: Indigenous Communities
Related Documents
Research Papers/Articles
Implementation lessons from World Bank operations in supporting indigenous peoples
Published Year: 2023
Abstract:
To identify lessons from World Bank operational experience in addressing implementation challe... Read More
Reports
State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, Vol 1
Published Year: 2009
Abstract:
The situation of indigenous peoples in ma... Read More